I don’t write this blog often
enough. Most of the time, when I sit down to write it, I think to myself – you could
be doing your book – and I end up writing that instead. It is not in my nature to tell people I don’t
know about myself, and to need them to know what I’m doing. The way I interface
with the world is mostly through the books and I imagine it will stay that way.
But I wanted to write now and
thank those of you who have written in to say you enjoyed, or are still enjoying
since it only just came out, the new Inspector Pekkala book. Even though the
book was only published a week or so ago, I have had more messages from more
kind people than I received altogether for the first book in the series.
I know it is a horrible cliché
to say that something warms the heart, but it literally does to read such
thoughtful and enthusiastic messages. There are a lot of days when things aren’t
going smoothly with the writing – too many interruptions or a piece of the plot
which I have to take apart and put back together, as brutal an operation as
breaking a bone which has set incorrectly – and I start to lose faith in what I
am doing. This is not one of those jobs in which you get regular and consistent
feedback, as you might in a sports game for example. With the writing, weeks
and months go by when you are so far down in the mines that you can’t even
remember the way out, let alone keep track of what you are ultimately trying to
create.
The publications of the
books, both the Eastland series and those I have written under my own name
(Paul Watkins) used to be a huge event for me.
It was inevitably disorienting, whether things went well or not. Good
news is as diverting as bad news when what you really need to be doing is
sitting at your desk and writing. I had to work very hard not to be run off the
rails by publicity work, reviews and the pressure to keep up momentum.
A strange thing happened to
me a couple of years ago which, although it was a little traumatic at the time,
actually helped me to gain some distance. I used to read all the reviews, good
or bad, and did my best not only to be grateful to those people who had taken
the time to write them no matter what they said, but also, if possible, to
learn from them with an eye towards writing in the future. Then I started to
notice that I was getting identical reviews on various websites – and by
identical, I mean word for word the same – but apparently written by different
people. The other strange thing about these reviews, all of which were horrible
by the way, was that they appeared to be generic. They could have applied to
any book at all. I knew something was fishy but wasn’t sure there was anything
I could do about it. Then I received word that I had even targeted by another
author, named RJ Ellory, who also wrote crime fiction. Apparently, he had
created a number of accounts on Amazon and was using these accounts, all of
them listed under different names, to undermine the work of people he believed
to be the competition. He was also writing rave reviews for himself under these
same names, which I thought was just funny. He got caught eventually, and his various fake
accounts were made known, which is how I found out about it. I hadn’t lost any
sleep over it – if you are kind-hearted enough about humanity to think that
there aren’t people out there who will do everything they can to wreck you,
particularly if they can hide behind a mask while they are doing it, just
because they can – they this is the wrong line of work to be in. But I thought it was so sad and desperate and
so cheapening of his own talent that RJ Ellory had taken it upon himself to do
this, that I quite reading reviews altogether.
But I do read the messages
that people send to me through the Inspector Pekkala website, and I am pretty
good about writing back to everyone, although sometimes it takes me a couple of
weeks. I very much appreciate those of you who have take the time to write,
particularly over the past couple of weeks. I’m glad you are enjoying the new
book – The Beast in the Red Forest.
It was a real pleasure creating a nemesis for
Pekkala. The challenge was to avoid
making someone who was simply his opposite. You have to give them a reason for
being who they are, no matter how twisted that is. And the thing about people
who are twisted is that what makes sense to them isn’t necessarily going to
make sense to the rest of us. The logic by which they pursue their goals, and
the goals themselves, necessitates a departure from what normal people would
consider reality. What are you going to do if you go after someone for a crime
you think they committed and then you find out that the person you were hunting
is innocent? A normal person would simply admit they were wrong and call a halt
to their private crusade. But what if the need for vengeance has become so much
a part of who you are that it is the only thing that makes sense to you
anymore? What kind of lies do we tell ourselves in order to justify the things
we do, even when we know they are lies? These were the kind of questions I had
to answer as I was piecing together the Frankenstein monster that Pekkala must
face in this book.
I am just finishing up the
next book in the series. My desk is strewn with post-it notes and red-lined manuscript.
It will be out this time next year, and I hope you will enjoy that one as well.
But I promise to write more of
this blog before then.
I just discovered your series through the work of the Amazon algorithm and have gone about acquiring those readily available in the U.S. The thought came to mind as I reread his meeting with Stalin after the death of Grodek and finding the Tsar's treasure, why should Pekkala believe Stalin that Ilya has in fact wed someone else? Maybe I am too much the romantic, but it seems plausible that Stalin recognized the idealist in Pekkala and would have wanted to keep him in the Soviet Union to do his bidding. Being the romantic, I hope that it is in your hip pocket for Pekkala to achieve his freedom and his love when your series comes to a close.
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting blog. I have just found it and this is the first post I read. This brings to light the behind the scenes/desk work of a writer. I don't read a lot of books, perhaps 3-4 a year. I'm a picky reader and when I couldn't find any of your new books, I assumed you quit writing books. I haven't read your competition except for the classics in your kind. I haven't posted on Amazon or elsewhere, except this. It is interesting to hear what life is like in your world. Thanks for replying to my recent email. It was something new like hiking up Fern Gully after a few years rest.
ReplyDelete